An Abundance of Downloads
I heard recently that some reprographers are allowing free downloads of
drawings. I'm sorry, but I don't get it. What if Apple made
downloads from iTunes free so they could sell more CD's? The explanation
I got was reprographers were giving away downloads to get the printing
business. Okay, but that is not where the value is. If you are in
the business of aggregating, preparing and distribution "construction
media" how you deliver it is simply a preference of the customer.
All of the hard work is before it is printed or downloaded. That is
ultimately what you are getting paid for.
Downloads are an abundance-based model where printing is a scarcity-based
business model. There are only so many prints that you can make on a
printer, but the amount of downloads you can sell is infinite.
I know of a midsize international reprographics company that had an intense
internal debate whether they should allow downloads on their site. The
argument was it would affect their printing business. In the end the download
proponents won the battle they allowed downloads for roughly one euro a sheet
(about $1 at the time). At the end of the year someone asked how much
money they made on this. The answer was about one million euros
($1M). Did this affect their printing business? No one was
sure. It didn't appear to. But here's the real kicker. Their
margin on downloads were close to 100%. The marginal cost of a download
is zero.
If you were to print a 36" by 42" sheet at a price of $.05 a sqft
and a cost of $.03 a sqft. Your gross profit per sheet is $.21 (excluding
labor, rent, etc.). You would have to print 4,761,905 sqft per year to
make the same profit as $1M in downloads. That is a printer printing
396,825 sqft per month every month for 12 months.
It’s much easier to grow your business by promoting more downloads than
adding more printers. You may loose some printing, but gain some profits
and gain some customers. I'm certainly not promoting getting rid of
printers, but there is a lot of money to be made outside the printing.
Comments